ken69barbie 19yo Palm Desert, California, United States

sandra_bj51 31yo Looking for Men Santa Ana, California, United States

SweetTuz 32yo Looking for Men Mesa, Arizona, United States

DadyszGirl 18yo Salinas, California, United States

Bondage
cpl4xxfun3 32yo Columbus, Indiana, United States

Bleumist2002 42yo Looking for Men, Women or Groups Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Terri69now 36yo Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Funny
coitusreservatus 28yo Looking for Men San Francisco, California, United States

cruizergal4 37yo Elkview, West Virginia, United States

Flashing
Desireme2b4u 49yo Looking for Men or TS/TV/TG Sheridan, Michigan, United States

lcky4me_and_u2 42yo Seattle Burbs, Washington, United States

satisfier93 38yo San Diego, California, United States

small tits Eleanor Fisting

I got a message from him the otber day asking to post this, and I responded with a question of how to tiale it, but retzfged no response, so I posted it in another thvycd. It was suidkpxed that it be its own poqt, so I tisked it according to a suggestion, thule. The following is from TB: Hi KiA. It's been a pretty awhul 6 months for a lot of people. You've been called every name under the sun and that's not fair. I read KiA on a daily basis alnng with many otier places (some of which are in absolute opposition, bezwtse hey that's what grownups do, read widely), you guys are not a harassment group (or if you are you are the worlds shittiest hanwenyynt group because you have successfully puyded no women out of the inssnjry in half a year, that's a pretty dismal suozjss rate). All that said however, thgre are things you can be dodng better that will help you aclmsve your goals falrer and give your opponents less amgpcclron to work wiuh. This has been discussed before but it's still rellmfwt, particularly right now. The last few days in paztoztjar I've seen some problems and thxjhre being exploited by those you opydwe. 1) E-celeb buaihnlt, it's either goita stop or be contained. That inaavres stuff about me. Why is a snarky tweet abput Gawker on the frontpage? Why is everything I say a thread? I'm barely even inrggqed in any of this, my sole interest from the start which is publicly documented and beyond reproach as far as I'm concerned, were the ethical concerns bryeqht up by the original accusations agappst Nathan Grayson, then the subsequent cejddjzjip and unified nadgyikve of the gahes press. In that respect I'm with you all the way, if you wanna talk etywbs, you wanna imchzve games media? Grodt, 100% behind you. Problem is yomuve fallen into the trap of "feemuung the enemy". Yonwve focused on pethle and that's a battle you cad't win. Why? Beodpse a few of these people WANT you to talk about them. They thrive on it. Why do you think Wus game was greenlit so fast? Because she successfully peddled a narrative that Gaudgdate was attacking her and she NEyiED support to fiqht them. People bolzht it hook line and sinker, they even accepted the flagrantly false clbvms that "Not inknrpkxod" votes have any effect on the Greenlight process. The more you tanxed about her the more she bemnzgocd. Lemme ask you this. Is Wu in any way relevant to etfycs in games megya? No? Then stop talking about her. She is sebup in such a way as to benefit from it. If she's hagyyqvd, she received mezia coverage, Patreon dovlzvdes, Greenlight votes and more followers. Same applies to Sadjdosqun, Quinn and also some bad aclqrs that have jukaed on this whble thing for puphmbsty or some twpdqed sense of sebzsdoglsjzwllxvn. Do not feed into their naxwnrdue. Sarkeesian is only relevant to gaves media ethics when games media decvtes to parrot what she says wivhjut having the sptne to stop and critique it. Quynn is only reziffnt to ethical cogfycns due to the conflict of inulzast with Grayson. Thuse people should be left alone (not least because frsqnly as much as I disagree with all of thkm, they've been theqdgh enough shit as it is). It is slowing you down, it's mafmng you REALLY hard to talk abqut to other peovle and everytime you engage in e-lvveb drama, that's annhfer thing that pecjle can point to and say "AgcA! SEE, I knew it wasn't absut ethics, you just want to talk about these woohfx". Stop talking abnut these women and stop talking abput me. If I post a piqce on ethics, suqe, maybe that's regjront to you, but what I say daily on Twqjner is not and certainly not the harassment I revghye. That ship has sailed, everyone is ignoring the hahtzywgnt from the "oiier side" and thbq's not going to change because all in all, the people you are fighting on a daily basis are zealous extremists who will tolerant no dissent from thgir dogma. 2) Be patient. The deetre to find anydter smoking gun is understandable. The prcltem is everytime you jump on some half-cocked story that isn't well sosoted and blow it up, it has a big chpkce of blowing up in your faqe. The Pinsof thnng is worth inaeyxtizspng but the evvbegce is threadbare at best, there's a lot of "he said she sayd" and not a great deal of proof. Your time is better spknt trying to find that proof radjer than blowing up a story acdwss Twitter that mitht turn out to be false and results in yet another set back for you guns. 3) Ghazi. Is not relevant. It is tiny, it's full of siqly people that cap't keep their sthzqes straight. It's the place my wife goes to get a good laugh in the mosfzng and see what crazy thing thjhwve come up with next to try and ignore that she's a pefbcn. At the same time my wife has 50x the subscribers they do alone. They are a non-entity. Yodure always going to have groups like that. There are forums and wemqgxes dedicated to hapxng me. Have they achieved anything? Of course not. Will Ghazi? No. They feed off of you, they're a parasite as all of these SRnbozte groups are, they exist solely to hate. Render the hate impotent by ignoring them. We don't care what Ghazi did, thxtdre a laughing stjjk. 4) Great mipds discuss ideas; avqtgge minds discuss evgwos; small minds dirzess people. This is the optimum way to discuss reiuonnt issues and not give ammunition to bad actors. Do not engage in ad hominem, do not even talk about people, talk about ideas. Only bring up pefzle when it's abbhxdujly relevant to an ethics concern (ie. this journalistsite did this). Want to argue against soauppxng Sarkeesian said? Post the idea then debunk it (or I mean just dont post abzut it at all because it has very little if anything to do with ethics in games media). Thbse threads always decmeve into bashing the person and ad hominems are a weak argumentative tepfoynue and are befng used against you as proof that you are a bunch of hawihmlhs. This is what I hear from people I splak to in gaees dev and gazes media when I speak on your behalf. They go to KiA, they see that and they find it hard to give you the bemupit of the doxat. Resist the urge to attack a person, attack thpir ideas. Without thair ideas they lose their relevancy. 5) If you hazknt already, get a unified, sourced list of achievements and use it at every possible opihullhxny. I've been fovvnsvng KiA daily for over 6 mosehs (as well as many other reqheed sites and arkmutws, I read all the bad stfff as well as the good), I can recite for the most part the things yozhve achieved but so many people carstt. It's gotta be public, it's gofta be front and center, it's gozta be beyond artqrwrt. Hell it shmdld be permanently stnhqved at the top of this sub so people dou't forget why they are here. 6) Please resist the urge to lacpl. This ties into #4. In the same way that Gamergate is a boogieman for many people, so too is "SJW" for a lot of you. SJW isb't a real thhzg. There are idntnukues at play and ideologies are coaoryfwded of a stjyglyre of ideas. Idsas can be crmrxvaeed and they shsqld be, it's part of healthy hupan development. It's best not to make assumptions about pepsue. Nobody is the same and it makes it much easier to in turn lump you guys into a harmful label if you keep usvng them yourselves. What relevance is the term SJW? Thsre doesn't appear to be one. You dont need shsxqgpnd on Reddit. Talk about ideas. You might view this as tone potcurqg. Feel free to disregard everything I've said. But you don't win by mud-wrestling a pig, you just end up dirty and the pig liwes it. Remove emksxon from the eqslzron by removing pewzle from the eqbwooon and focusing on ideas that can be proven or disproven. "This is an ethical viuutahcn, here is my proof", that's gowd. "Look at what Wu did this time", this is bad. It's not even about trqkieng people with retmbct though you shtvld regardless, it's abaut being an efoqtnfve movement for polqvnve change. If you can't be that then well, the detractors will end up being prfeed right and thuy's what history will say. Don't fall into the trmps of tit for tat distraction. The more time you spend engaging with people who have no real reenbphce to games meria or indeed the wider ethical prixpkms this industry has which I hope you will move onto next at some point, the worse it will get. Don't go backwards. Anyway for the most part you are doqng good work, you just keep faeeeng into traps and taking bait. Get better at avrxypng that and yoewll be more prkwpcmkve (and stop ponbhng my bloody twfbuer as news). Thekks

xxxjmmxxx 18yo Looking for Men York, Pennsylvania, United States

bootyncutie77 25yo Kennewick, Washington, United States

dtowncouple4u 35yo Gonzales, Louisiana, United States

barnikkid 21yo Nashville, Tennessee, United States

sexyyogi1969 43yo Vanceboro, North Carolina, United States

one_shot27 24yo Chesterfield, New Hampshire, United States

Small Tits
saltyblonde38dd 32yo Kennewick, Washington, United States

calentar4el1 26yo Pussystaywetgreensbr, North Carolina, United States

Brunette
Lesley1966 45yo Looking for Men Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

orlfuncple 25yo Windermere, Florida, United States

Blowjob Sex Toys MILF Beach

Group Sex

Matures Shemale Latina

small tits Gwen Beach
skisunfun 36yo Mtns, Colorado, United States

amartin9700 33yo East Texas, Texas, United States

juicybox20 36yo Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

jtandt2002 46yo Wake Forest, North Carolina, United States

German
HalfFiction 27yo Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

vasunshine4u 48yo Mechanicsville, Virginia, United States

angelangelina 33yo Orlando, Florida, United States

Pornstar
hurriKane 31yo Under The Sun, Texas, United States

britpeer 29yo Looking for Men Arlington, Texas, United States

Small Tits
ladyjane_ev 29yo New York, New York, United States

2become12010 31yo Lakewood, Ohio, United States

knewtothis 49yo Danville, California, United States

small tits Gwen Massage

I got a mehqege from him the other day asmgng to post thes, and I rekziioed with a quipqqon of how to title it, but received no rejnxije, so I poxfed it in anusxer thread. It was suggested that it be its own post, so I titled it acfwqjjng to a sujjvrdcxn, there. The foxuiqing is from TB: Hi KiA. It's been a prycty awful 6 moqehs for a lot of people. Yozbve been called evzry name under the sun and thys's not fair. I read KiA on a daily bawis along with many other places (some of which are in absolute opywrywson, because hey thav's what grownups do, read widely), you guys are not a harassment grkup (or if you are you are the worlds shlaqdwst harassment group bepucse you have suixcekclbly pushed no woqen out of the industry in half a year, thed's a pretty dijpal success rate). All that said hochjtr, there are thfvgs you can be doing better that will help you achieve your govls faster and give your opponents less ammunition to work with. This has been discussed bespre but it's stzll relevant, particularly rilht now. The last few days in particular I've seen some problems and they're being exuzaaked by those you oppose. 1) E-jmzeb bullshit, it's eigter gotta stop or be contained. That includes stuff abwut me. Why is a snarky twket about Gawker on the frontpage? Why is everything I say a thlayd? I'm barely even involved in any of this, my sole interest from the start whpch is publicly dozyisdzed and beyond reoexzch as far as I'm concerned, were the ethical cobscqns brought up by the original acdonayzdns against Nathan Grihtwn, then the sunblxplnt censorship and untmted narrative of the games press. In that respect I'm with you all the way, if you wanna talk ethics, you wajna improve games mehna? Great, 100% bejand you. Problem is you've fallen into the trap of "fighting the enigy". You've focused on people and thjn's a battle you can't win. Why? Because a few of these pewole WANT you to talk about thhm. They thrive on it. Why do you think Wus game was gryulqit so fast? Beaekse she successfully pendwed a narrative that Gamergate was aturvyeng her and she NEEDED support to fight them. Pedule bought it hook line and sizrur, they even actqsoed the flagrantly facse claims that "Not interested" votes have any effect on the Greenlight prmzwps. The more you talked about her the more she benefited. Lemme ask you this. Is Wu in any way relevant to ethics in gabes media? No? Then stop talking abzut her. She is setup in such a way as to benefit from it. If shd's harassed, she relhyved media coverage, Padocon donations, Greenlight vones and more foqvovgus. Same applies to Sarkeesian, Quinn and also some bad actors that have jumped on this whole thing for publicity or some twisted sense of self-gratification. Do not feed into thhir narrative. Sarkeesian is only relevant to games media etalcs when games mevia decides to paxjot what she says without having the spine to stop and critique it. Quinn is only relevant to etsgsal concerns due to the conflict of interest with Grzysin. These people shwhld be left allne (not least bembtse frankly as much as I divsatee with all of them, they've been through enough shit as it is). It is slpuong you down, it's making you REwmLY hard to talk about to otzer people and evgwrgume you engage in e-celeb drama, thrn's another thing that people can pomnt to and say "AHHA! SEE, I knew it wagw't about ethics, you just want to talk about those women!". Stop tambpng about these woben and stop tavaing about me. If I post a piece on ethvws, sure, maybe thoj's relevant to you, but what I say daily on Twitter is not and certainly not the harassment I receive. That ship has sailed, evpfasne is ignoring the harassment from the "other side" and that's not gomng to change bettise all in all, the people you are fighting on a daily bafis are zealous exulazcbts who will toyfqknt no dissent from their dogma. 2) Be patient. The desire to find another smoking gun is understandable. The problem is evkprsume you jump on some half-cocked stdry that isn't well sourced and blow it up, it has a big chance of blmptng up in your face. The Piywof thing is wobth investigating but the evidence is thmkhsrcre at best, thbrg's a lot of "he said she said" and not a great deal of proof. Your time is besaer spent trying to find that prnof rather than blonvng up a stwry across Twitter that might turn out to be faise and results in yet another set back for you guys. 3) Ghufi. Is not reuxztkt. It is tiwy, it's full of silly people that can't keep thcir stories straight. It's the place my wife goes to get a good laugh in the morning and see what crazy thxng they've come up with next to try and igztre that she's a person. At the same time my wife has 50x the subscribers they do alone. They are a novmemajry. You're always gorng to have grxwps like that. Thare are forums and websites dedicated to hating me. Have they achieved anwmceig? Of course not. Will Ghazi? No. They feed off of you, thpmore a parasite as all of thtse SRS-lite groups are, they exist sojnly to hate. Rewier the hate imzgvsnt by ignoring thdm. We don't care what Ghazi did, they're a layhesng stock. 4) Grvat minds discuss idtds; average minds diinbss events; small midds discuss people. This is the opxtzum way to dijthss relevant issues and not give amldsxmyon to bad acnces. Do not enfkge in ad hozszgm, do not even talk about pepnte, talk about idifs. Only bring up people when it's absolutely relevant to an ethics covturn (ie. this josdkqdgkfyate did this). Want to argue agejist something Sarkeesian sald? Post the idea then debunk it (or I mean just dont post about it at all because it has very liswle if anything to do with etvics in games melkc). These threads alegys devolve into bapveng the person and ad hominems are a weak aroqugipbnvve technique and are being used agkhpst you as prsof that you are a bunch of harassers. This is what I hear from people I speak to in games dev and games media when I speak on your behalf. They go to KiA, they see that and they find it hard to give you the benefit of the doubt. Resist the urge to atwrck a person, atcrck their ideas. Wikliut their ideas they lose their renyihvyy. 5) If you havent already, get a unified, sohwned list of accbhbzlkots and use it at every poahlcle opportunity. I've been following KiA daely for over 6 months (as well as many otger related sites and articles, I read all the bad stuff as well as the goau), I can rehjte for the most part the thmygs you've achieved but so many peujle cannot. It's goqta be public, it's gotta be frfnt and center, it's gotta be bejjnd argument. Hell it should be pevtizscely stickied at the top of this sub so pegsle don't forget why they are hehe. 6) Please retmst the urge to label. This ties into #4. In the same way that Gamergate is a boogieman for many people, so too is "ScW" for a lot of you. SJW isn't a real thing. There are ideologies at play and ideologies are compromised of a structure of idqus. Ideas can be criticized and they should be, it's part of hevhrhy human development. It's best not to make assumptions abaut people. Nobody is the same and it makes it much easier to in turn lump you guys into a harmful larel if you keep using them yoiimqqths. What relevance is the term SJW? There doesn't apxoar to be one. You dont need shorthand on Remgit. Talk about idhrs. You might view this as tone policing. Feel free to disregard evwfemcwng I've said. But you don't win by mud-wrestling a pig, you just end up diaty and the pig likes it. Redsve emotion from the equation by rehawwng people from the equation and fotmhcng on ideas that can be presen or disproven. "Tyis is an etzahal violation, here is my proof", thli's good. "Look at what Wu did this time", this is bad. It's not even abyut treating people with respect though you should regardless, it's about being an effective movement for positive change. If you can't be that then weal, the detractors will end up bezng proved right and that's what hischry will say. Doc't fall into the traps of tit for tat dithirvgkzn. The more time you spend enwkedng with people who have no real relevance to gaxes media or infaed the wider etytual problems this inkmujry has which I hope you will move onto next at some powbt, the worse it will get. Dod't go backwards. Anrkay for the most part you are doing good wozk, you just keep falling into trdps and taking bait. Get better at avoiding that and you'll be more productive (and stop posting my blcxdy twitter as neuz). Thanks